Friday, 19 April 2013

  • upublic.tv Introductory Survey

    Recently I decided that it's time to resurrect The Weekly Sedition as a video series or radio show or podcast or whatever – something besides a simple blog.

    Since I last produced a show at Channel 27, the station has switched hands, from Quote Unquote to uPublic TV. So recently I stopped by the uPublic offices to see what the signup procedures are – I was told to go to the site, which redirected me to the uPublic meetup.com group. There I had to fill out an introductory survey to join the group. Here are my answers:

    Write a short bio

    I was a producer at Channel 27 for a few years and am looking to get back into the game. More information is available upon request.

    Please answer these questions completely. How did you find out about his group?

    UPublic -- From the web and another producer.

    This meetup -- I talked to someone at the 3rd St NW office. He told me to sign up at http://upublicans.com, which redirected to here.

    Why do you want to join this group?

    To learn how to develop content for Channel 27 and other media outlets, and to "get back in the game."

    How much television program production experience do you have?

    About 12 years on Channel 27 through Quote Unquote.

    Do you understand that you are required to attend two mandatory classes before getting access to any other resources?

    Yes. Quote Unquote has a similar requirement. Most organizations are like that, and the ones that aren't are asking for trouble.

    Besides the two mandatory classes, what other classes would you like to attend?

    What's available, and what are the requirements (costs, prerequisites, etc.) ?


    NOTES

    1. Reposted –

      1. Personal blogs and micro-blogs – Blogspot / Wordpress


    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Friday, 05 April 2013

  • A Question about Abortion and Homosexuality

    If the biotech and medical fields were to devise some sort of prenatal test, accurate to 99 percent, that could determine whether the baby-to-be was going to be heterosexual or homosexual, would it then be acceptable to abort that baby if it turned out to be homosexual?

    This of course assumes that sexual orientation is a genetically-determined trait – something that has yet to be scientifically proven.

Sunday, 31 March 2013

Saturday, 23 March 2013

  • My On and Off Switches

    OK, time to take a break from the politicking for a bit, if for no other reason than to prove that I'm not a one-trick pony here.

    I guess it's time to jump on board this particular Xanga bandwagon. Never mind that this will be crossposted to what's become my main blog site.

    First the "bad news" . . .

    My Turn-Offs

    1. Ignorance, especially the intentional kind. Even worse, people who are ignorant, yet insist that they have all the answers.

    2. Habitual tardiness. If you say you'll be there at 7 PM, be there at 7 PM.

    3. Dishonesty. Especially when it concerns where a potential partner and I stand with each other.

    4. Head games about where I stand with a potential partner.

    5. Control freaks. I got it from both Mom and Dad as a kid and teenager – my brother and I were the little flags on the tug-of-war rope. I've seen that tendency in myself, as well, and I don't like it. What is it that Alcoholics Anonymous tells the drunks – "Admitting you have a problem is the first step" ?

    6. Gangsta princesses, with the cheap-looking tattoos and cheesy dollar-store bling. That should be self-explanatory.

    7. Excessive makeup and jewelry. Less is more in this category.

    8. Insistence that I change my views, interests and preferences. Especially when I've already expressed a distaste for the expected replacements.

    9. Expecting me to provide what you want without giving me anything that I want in return

    10. Self-pity – no guy worthy of the name wants the question "Do I look fat?"

    On to the good stuff.

    My Turn-Ons

    1. General agreement and tolerance where my politics and religion (more accurately, lack of religion) are concerned. Better yet, you have similar interests along those lines.

    2. Similar tastes in movies, music, food and drink.

    3. Tolerance for the self-defense tech that I own and sometimes carry. Better yet, you have similar interests along those lines.

    4. Punctuality. If you say you'll be there at 7 PM, be there at 7 PM. Or maybe even a little early.

    5. Flirting and teasing is more fun when it goes back and forth.

    6. Reciprocity – I give what I get. I expect to get what I give.

    7. A sense of humor similar to mine.

    8. The understanding that when you want to get something from me, you have to give me something in exchange. As Heinlein said, "There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch."

    9. A potential partner for workouts, sparring, those sorts of things.

    In short, if you see that I makes your life better, tell me. And be specific. Figure out A) what I like and B) what I hate (I'm willing to tell you if you're willing to listen), offer to do A and avoid B, AND STICK TO IT.

    All I can offer here is the same deal – to figure out A) what you like and B) what you don't like, then offer to do A and avoid B.


    FOR FURTHER REFERENCE

    1. John Ross – Ross In Range

      1. Advice to Women About Men, or JR Uses Your Wristwatch to Tell You the Time

      2. Understanding Women & "The Rules" For Men, or Think of it Like Driving in England

      3. Women, Teasing, Tests, One-itis, and Hope, or Ross in Range Stands in for Dear Abby

      4. Ask the Assassin, or The Advice Request Emails Won't Stop Coming

      5. Ask the Assassin: Thoughts on Marriage, or Why the Hell Are You Asking Me, Anyway?


    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Friday, 22 March 2013

  • DFA Survey -- What's Most Important in 2013?

    Recently I received via email a survey from the "left" "liberal" fascist group "Democracy for America."

    Chances are that they don't actually care about what I think about the various issues – after I clicked the "Submit" button, a page asking me to donate ∅∅∅∅∅ came up. I suspect that's all they were after all along, and that the "survey" was simply camouflage towards that end – "We care what you think. Give us money."

    Here at Democracy for America, members like you make our work possible -- and that means you get to call the shots.

    What are your top priorities for this year? What issues matter most to you? What candidates in your area should we endorse?

    As we work to change our country and the Democratic party from the bottom-up, it's important we hear from you -- that's what being people-powered is all about.

    Please, take a moment and share your thoughts. 

    What is the most important issue to you right now?
    Civil Liberties
    If your top issue is not listed above, please tell us about it here.
    Repealing and overturning unnecessary laws, stopping new bad laws from getting enacted in the first place
    Is there a candidate in your area that we should know about?
    Maybe Gary Johnson?
    What other issues are you following right now? [My choices in boldface – MWB]
    Big Business
    Budget and Taxes
    Campaign Finance Reform
    Civil Liberties
    Economy and Jobs
    Education
    Elections
    Environment
    Gun Safety
    Health Care
    Immigration
    Labor and Unions
    LGBT Rights
    Medicare
    Net Neutrality and Internet Freedom
    Privacy
    Social Security
    Veterans
    Voting Rights
    War and Peace
    Women's Rights
    What state do you live in?
    New Mexico
    Is there anything else you'd like to share about the issues or elections you're following in 2013?
    How about the Democratic Party's elected officials start repealing some laws for a change, and lessen the burden of government upon the rest of us?

    Protecting the individual right to own and carry military-pattern weapons as is supposed to be protected by the Second Amendment is a big issue for me personally. The more likely a candidate is to support repealing the National Firearms Act of 1934, the more likely that candidate will get my support.


    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Thursday, 21 March 2013

Tuesday, 19 March 2013

  • The "Sequester," The Budget and Other Goodies

    Taking note of an article in The Weekly StandardReporter Asks Carney: Will Obama Cut Back on Lavish Vacations, Golf Trips?

    So I guess a cut of 85,000,000,000[1] out of a budget of 3,800,000,000,000[1] really isn't such a bad thing after all, is it? Maybe, just maybe . . . they could, you know, cut a bit more?

    Dare I hope for such "slash and burn" legislation?

    Never mind that no such budget has actually been passed by both U.S. House and U.S. Senate and been signed by Dear Leader Obama, as the U.S. Constitution supposedly requires?

    Isn't someone who was allegedly a "Constitutional law professor" supposed to notice things like these?

    How is it that I, with ZERO formal schooling beyond the high school level in the law, the legislative process or the political process can notice this, but 535 people who allegedly swore to uphold and defend the Constitution blow it off without a second thought?

    In my opinion, it would be worth it to pay Obama (and Biden, and Boehner, and the other 534 idiots) 1,000,000 a year, tax free, to do nothing but play golf all year around.

    Just make sure that they understand that the deal is OFF the second any of them picks up any sort of writing implement or touches any sort of keyboard.


    NOTES

    1. These numbers are ballpark wild-assed guesstimates, of course. As the cliche goes, "close enough for government work."

    2.    
    3. I have a habit of using the null set symbol ("∅") to represent Federal Reserve Notes as opposed to the "dollar sign" ("$"), because the dollar is supposed to be backed by gold or silver, where the Federal Reserve Note is redeemable upon government demand from yours and my life, liberty, property and pursuit of happiness.

    4. Original article


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico and Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Monday, 18 March 2013

  • Sir Mix-A-Lot -- No Holds Barred

    "No Holds Barred" by Sir Mix-A-Lot

    "The police, urge people, to keep their guns locked up and unloaded"
    "Congress today, seems on the verge of approving gun control"

    [Verse One: Sir Mix-A-Lot]
    It's, time to fight back cause the new jack black macks
    ain't did SHIT about that, whack, jackin
    And I'm packin
    Cause I'm down for the bank I'm stackin
    And in a straight up brawl I'll mall alla y'all
    Ya try to crawl for Tylenol and I install
    big fists in your face, the blow is well placed
    Spray 'em with mace in case mace is his taste
    Throw up the dogs, the competition is fogged
    Cause he was smokin the yang, iced and drink the 8-ball
    Drunk, stumblin, threw him with the lean
    I sweep him, then attack the spleen
    Play the congas on his backbone
    He's funk baritone until I twisted his dome
    Creep up on my house and try to roll me up?
    And got STUCK IN THE GUT with a black, Glock
    And he starts to wobble
    Self-defense is what I'm claimin', let's squabble
    I pick up a pipe to take plenty of quick swipes
    One grazed his dome and sliced his eye whites
    I don't give a DAMN bout a stupid ass burgular
    It's all circular
    The dope dealer sells dope to the dope smoker
    The smoker breaks in and tries to choke ya
    But I ain't the one to run from ya son
    This is MY HOUSE, and it's FULLA GUNS!
    I'm down for mine and my choke is nice and hard
    When you jack the boss there ain't no holds barred!

    No holds barred
    No holds barred
    No holds barred

    [Verse Two: Sir Mix-A-Lot]
    I'm crushin most hoods like katydids
    I'm pleadin guilty for the damage I did
    This ain't about random violence
    The (?) crept into my house, FUCK SILENCE
    Now most punks wanna run for the stun gun
    Fuck a stun gun, I got the big one
    Forty-four mag, automatic, CHROME
    Mercury-tipped bullets, melt the dome
    It's the 1990's, and crack is
    talkin to the criminals, ever so subliminal
    Some crackhead wants Mix-A-Lot dead
    A jack move instead, another fool bled
    I can't cry cause my tears are nearly froze
    My interior's cold, it posess my soul
    I'm on the paranoid tip
    And each of my socks got a clip!
    When my house got robbed, a top notch job
    Cops laughed while my mom just sobbed
    9-1-1 only works for the rich ones
    So I collect GUNS!
    So step right through if you're down for the wrong move
    Most crews are moved by my twelve gauge BOOM!
    How can I love when I gotta
    protect my neck from a punk suspect?
    Gun control – I ain't wit it
    They banned the AK and any fool can STILL get it
    The innocent have been beaten, bruised and scarred
    But for this citizen, there ain't no holds barred

    "It is an absolute infringement on my second amendment rights"
    No holds barred
    "When is this attack on gun owners going to end?"
    No holds barred
    "Education, versus restriction"

    [Verse Three: Sir Mix-A-Lot]
    Hypothetical situation
    Gun control starts sweepin the nation
    Now you got a bunch of unarmed innocent victims
    Gettin FUCKED by the system
    Sittin at home with a butter knife, huh
    Any fool could rape your wife
    So what's up when the criminals can't be stopped?
    The only one with guns are the COPS
    But it's hard for a brother to trust police
    Huh, so the shit don't cease
    So I go downtown to buy a hot gun
    I hated criminals, and now I'm one
    Because I bought a gat to protect my house
    The cops wanna bust me out?
    So it's illegal to protect yourself?
    Hell, you either get killed, or you in jail
    So when you vote
    You better think about what I just wrote
    And FUCK writin a note to yo' Congressman!
    You got the fool hired
    Now help get the fool fired
    A scary scenario
    And I put it in your stereo
    So when a fool tries to run up on my car
    R.I.P., no holds barred

    No holds barred

    No holds barred

    "They take aim, at the law abiding citizen, instead of the criminal"
    [*applause*]


    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Thursday, 14 March 2013

  • The Armed Defense of Liberty by Dr. Alan Keyes

    The Armed Defense of Liberty

    By Dr. Alan Keyes – July 30, 1999

    Despite the heroic efforts of Sen. Bob Smith to turn it back, the latest batch of irrational and servile restrictions on the Second Amendment continues to ooze its way through that allegedly deliberative institution, the Congress. Perhaps because the gun control debate is now so entirely drenched in the emotive sludge that is the principal intellectual food of our political establishment, this seems a good moment to recall the deep reasons, the fundamental context, that must inform any responsible deliberations on the question of an armed citizenry.

    I believe that underlying all of the prominent issues of the day – abortion, the breakdown of the family and of our educational institutions, the betrayal of our national sovereignty and military readiness, and the ongoing expansion of government's tyrannical claims to tax and regulate – we can discern what is essentially one moral challenge which manifests itself in many areas. Simply stated, that challenge has to do with the corruption of our understanding of freedom, which leads to the abandonment of respect for law and individual responsibility, the twin pillars which ought to under-gird true freedom.

    As a free people, our way of life depends upon certain moral ideas. As a matter of personal conscience, I believe that Christianity most perfectly embodies those ideas. But since Americans come from many different religious backgrounds, in dealing with issues of public policy, we must derive these ideas from sources that are open to support from all the people.

    Nothing meets this purpose more completely than the principles and logic of our own Declaration of Independence, so American citizens and statesmen should make it the explicit basis for dealing with the moral crisis we now face.

    The Declaration is fundamentally a statement of the principles of justice that define the moral identity of the American people. It presents a certain concept of our human nature and draws out the political consequences of that concept.

    All human beings are created equal. They need no title or qualification beyond their simple humanity in order to command respect for their intrinsic human dignity, their "unalienable rights." The purpose of government is to secure these rights, and no government is just or legitimate if it systematically violates them.

    But the Declaration is more than just an assertion of rights. It also makes a clear statement about the ultimate source of authority which commands respect for those rights. God, the Creator, the author of the laws of nature, is that source.

    Thus the effective prerequisite for human rights is respect for God's authority and His eternal laws. This is also the prerequisite for the idea of government based upon consent, which includes free elections, representation, due process of law, etc. If we accept the logic of our Declaration of Independence, this reverence for God is not just a matter of religious faith. It is the foundation of justice and citizenship in our republic.

    Therefore, our freedom is derived from our respect for law, especially the highest law as embodied in the will of the Creator. Thus freedom, rightly understood, cannot be confused with mere licentiousness. It first of all involves the duty to respect its own foundations in the laws of nature and nature's God. That's why our rights are "unalienable," which means that we do not have the right to surrender or destroy them by our choice or actions.

    Indeed, if we make the judgment that our rights are being systematically violated, we have the duty to resist and overthrow the power responsible. This duty involves both the judgment and the moral and material capacity to resist tyranny. These principles constitute our character as a free people, which it is our duty to maintain.

    It is in the context of these principles that we must understand the purpose of the Second Amendment, and the duties that it implies. The Founders added the Second Amendment to the Constitution so that when, after a long train of abuses, a government evinces a methodical design upon our natural rights, we will have the means to protect and recover those rights.

    If we make the judgment that our rights are being systematically violated, we have not merely the right, but the duty, to resist and overthrow the power responsible. It is very hard to do this if the government has all the weapons, something that our Founders and the generations before and after them knew from repeated and first-hand experience, as well as from a study of history. A strong case can be made, therefore, that it is a fundamental DUTY of the free citizen to keep and bear arms.

    The claim that the Second Amendment is principally concerned with the maintenance of state militias – military bodies under the direction and control of state governments – is not just historically false, it is also fundamentally incoherent. It would make no sense whatsoever to restrict the right to keep and bear arms to state governments, since the principle on which our polity is based, as stated in the Declaration, recognizes that any government, at any level, can become oppressive of our rights. And we must be prepared to defend ourselves against its abuses. The gun control movement is incompatible with the sovereignty of the people, because it aims to eliminate one of the key material supports of that sovereignty.

    This is not the principal danger of the gun control movement, however. Perhaps more important than the physical disarmament the government is attempting is the moral disarmament that accompanies it. If we accept the view that the American people cannot be trusted with the material objects necessary to defend their liberty, we will surely accept as well the view that the American people cannot be trusted with liberty itself. Why should a man who can't be trusted to refrain from murder be trusted with the much more difficult and morally subtle task of choosing his leaders responsibly?

    The advocates of gun control take as their first principle that the American people are morally incompetent creatures of passion. The America they envision for us is, accordingly, more like a national 24-hour day-care center than a self-governing republic of free men and women. If we agree to accept this apparently comfortable arrangement, we will have to check our citizenship at the door along with our guns.

    If, on the other hand, we intend to exercise the duties of self-government and justice that are our patrimony as free and rational creatures, then we will need to think clearly and coherently about securing the means necessary to do so. We must defend the moral self-confidence of America by reasserting the capacity of our people to make the most important decisions and bear the most important responsibilities themselves. And we must retain the material means necessary to shoot the windows out of the national day-care center, if it comes to that.

    Second Amendment rights are sacred because of their connection to higher rights and higher duties, which are the very substance of liberty and justice, and to the God that America has always acknowledged as the source of both. We cannot surrender our guns without surrendering the vision of human dignity under God which is our national soul. The slow erosion of our national understanding of this fact is continuing in the Congress. Only a citizenry armed with a clear understanding of what is at stake can ultimately save us from the civic imbecility to which the gun control movement leads. By disarming, we will confess to our government that we no longer aspire to sovereignty, and wish our rulers to take up this burden in our stead. We will be signaling with great clarity that we wish to be comfortable slaves – and slaves, at least, we will soon become.

    The terrible history of the 20th century should make clear enough that subjection to unlimited government is not desirable. But a clear and thoughtful examination of our national principles teaches us also that it is our duty to shun such servitude. It is our right, and it is our duty, to remain free.


    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

  • Sundown at Coffin Rock

    Sundown at Coffin Rock
    by Raymond K. Paden

    The old man walked slowly through the dry, fallen leaves of autumn, his practiced eye automatically choosing the bare and stony places in the trail for his feet. There was scarcely a sound as he passed, though his left knee was stiff with scar tissue. He grunted occasionally as the tight sinews pulled. Damn chainsaw, he thought.

    Behind him, the boy shuffled along, trying to imitate his grandfather, but unable to mimic the silent motion that the old man had learned during countless winter days upon this wooded mountain in pursuit of game. He's fifteen years old, the old man thought. Plenty old enough to be learning. But that was another time, another America. His mind drifted, and he saw himself, a fifteen-year-old boy following in the footsteps of his own grandfather, clutching a twelve gauge in his trembling hands as they tracked a wounded whitetail.

    The leg was hurting worse now, and he slowed his pace a bit. Plenty of time. It should have been my own son here with me now, the old man thought sadly. But Jason had no interest, no understanding. He cared for nothing but pounding on the keys of that damned computer terminal. He knew nothing about the woods, or where food came from . . . or freedom. And that's my fault, isn't it?

    The old man stopped and held up his hand, motioning for the boy to look. In the small clearing ahead, the deer stood motionless, watching them. It was a scraggly buck, underfed and sickly, but the boy's eyes lit up with excitement. It had been many years since they had seen even a single whitetail here on the mountain. After the hunting had stopped, the population had exploded. The deer had eaten the mountain almost bare until erosion had become a serious problem in some places. That following winter, three starving does had wandered into the old man's yard, trying to eat the bark off of his pecan trees, and he had wished the "animal rights" fanatics could have been there then. It was against the law, but old man knew a higher law, and he took an axe into the yard and killed the starving beasts. They did not have the strength to run.

    The buck finally turned and loped away, and they continued down the trail to the river. When they came to the "Big Oak," the old man turned and pushed through the heavy brush beside the trail and the boy followed, wordlessly. The old man knew that Thomas was curious about their leaving the trail, but the boy had learned to move silently (well, almost) and that meant no talking. When they came to "Coffin Rock," the old man sat down upon it and motioned for the boy to join him.

    "You see this rock, shaped like a casket?" the old man asked. "Yes sir." The old man smiled. The boy was respectful and polite. He loved the outdoors, too. Everything a man could ask in a grandson . . . . or a son.

    "I want you to remember this place, and what I'm about to tell you. A lot of it isn't going to make any sense to you, but it's important and one day you'll understand it well enough. The old man paused. Now that he was here, he didn't really know where to start.

    "Before you were born," he began at last, "this country was different. I've told you about hunting, about how everybody who obeyed the law could own guns. A man could speak out, anywhere, without worrying about whether he'd get back home or not. School was different, too. A man could send his kids to a church school, or a private school, or even teach them at home. But even in the public schools, they didn't spend all their time trying to brainwash you like they do at yours now." The old man paused, and was silent for many minutes. The boy was still, watching a chipmunk scavenging beside a fallen tree below them.

    "Things don't ever happen all at once, boy. They just sort of sneak up on you. Sure, we knew guns were important; we just didn't think it would ever happen in America. But we had to do something about crime, they said. It was a crisis. Everything was a crisis! It was a drug crisis, or a terrorism crisis, or street crime, or gang crime. Even a 'health care' crisis was an excuse to take away a little more of our rights." The old man turned to look at his grandson.

    "They ever let you read a thing called the Constitution down there at your school?" The boy solemnly shook his head. "Well, the Fourth Amendment's still in there. It says there won't be any unreasonable searches and seizures. It says you're safe in your own home." The old man shrugged. "That had to go. It was a crisis! They could kick your door open any time, day or night, and come in with guns blazing if they thought you had drugs . . . or later, guns. Oh, at first it was just registration – to keep the guns out of the hands of criminals! But that didn't work, of course, and then later when they wanted to take 'em they knew where to look. They banned 'assault rifles', and then 'sniper rifles', and 'Saturday night specials.' Everything you saw on the TV or in the movies was against us. God knows the news people were! And the schools were teaching our kids that nobody needed guns anymore. We tried to take a stand, but we felt like the whole face of our country had changed and we were left outside."

    "Me and a friend of mine, when we saw what was happening, we came and built a secret place up here on the mountain. A place where we could put our guns until we needed them. We figured some day Americans would remember what it was like to be free, and what kind of price we had to pay for that freedom. So we hid our guns instead of losing them."

    "One fellow I knew disagreed. He said we ought to use our guns now and stand up to the government. Said that the colonists had fought for their freedom when the British tried to disarm them at Lexington and Concord. Well, he and a lot of others died in what your history books call the 'Tax Revolt of 1998,' but son, it wasn't the revolt that caused the repeal of the Second Amendment like your history book says. The Second Amendment was already gone long before they ever repealed it. The rest of us thought we were doing the right thing by waiting. I hope to God we were right."

    "You see, Thomas. It isn't government that makes a man free. In the end, governments always do just the opposite. They gobble up freedom like hungry pigs. You have to have laws to keep the worst in men under control, but at the same time the people have to have guns, too, in order to keep the government itself under control. In our country, the people were supposed to be the final authority of the law, but that was a long time ago. Once the guns were gone, there was no reason for those who run the government to give a damn about laws and constitutional rights and such. They just did what they pleased and anyone who spoke out . . . well, I'm getting ahead of myself."

    "It took a long time to collect up all the millions of firearms that were in private hands. The government created a whole new agency to see to it. There were rewards for turning your friends in, too. Drug dealers and murderers were set free after two or three years in prison, but possession of a gun would get you mandatory life behind bars with no parole.

    "I don't know how they found out about me, probably knew I'd been a hunter all those years, or maybe somebody turned me in. They picked me up on suspicion and took me down to the federal building."

    "Son, those guys did everything they could think of to me. Kept me locked up in this little room for hours, no food, no water. They kept coming in, asking me where the guns were. 'What guns?' I said. Whenever I'd doze off, they'd come crashing in, yelling and hollering. I got to where I didn't know which end was up. I'd say I wanted my lawyer and they'd laugh. 'Lawyers are for criminals', they said. 'You'll get a lawyer after we get the guns.' What's so funny is, I know they thought they were doing the right thing. They were fighting crime!"

    "When I got home I found Ruth sitting in the middle of the living room floor, crying her eyes out. The house was a shambles. While I was down there, they'd come out and took our house apart. Didn't need a search warrant, they said. National emergency! Gun crisis! Your grandma tried to call our preacher and they ripped the phone off the wall. Told her that they'd go easy on me if she just told them where I kept my guns." The old man laughed. "She told them to go to hell." He stared into the distance for a moment as his laughter faded.

    "They wouldn't tell her about me, where I was or anything, that whole time. She said that she'd thought I was dead. She never got over that day, and she died the next December."

    "They've been watching me ever since, off and on. I guess there's not much for them to do anymore, now that all the guns are gone. Plenty of time to watch one foolish old man." He paused. Beside him, the boy stared at the stone beneath his feet.

    "Anyway, I figure that, one day, America will come to her senses. Our men will need those guns and they'll be ready. We cleaned them and sealed them up good; they'll last for years. Maybe it won't be in your lifetime, Thomas. Maybe one day you'll be sitting here with your son or grandson. Tell him about me, boy. Tell him about the way I said America used to be." The old man stood, his bad leg shaking unsteadily beneath him.

    "You see the way this stone points? You follow that line one hundred feet down the hill and you'll find a big round rock. It looks like it's buried solid, but one man with a good prybar can lift it, and there's a concrete tunnel right under there that goes back into the hill."

    The old man stood, watching as the sun eased toward the ridge, coloring the sky and the world red. Below them, the river still splashed among the stones, as it had for a million years. It's still going, the old man thought. There'll be someone left to carry on for me when I'm gone. It was harder to walk back. He felt old and purposeless now, and it would be easier, he knew, to give in to that aching heaviness in his left lung that had begun to trouble him more and more. Damn cigarettes, he thought. His leg hurt, and the boy silently came up beside him and supported him as they started down the last mile toward the house. How quiet he walks, the old man thought. He's learned well.

    It was almost dark when the boy walked in. His father looked up from his paper. "Did you and your granddad have a nice walk?"

    "Yes," the boy answered, opening the refrigerator. "You can call Agent Goodwin tomorrow. Gramps finally showed me where it is."

     

    Editor's note: "Sundown at Coffin Rock" is a work of fiction. Any similarity to actual events or to actual people, living or dead, remains to be seen. – Mark Pixler


    This article was originally posted to the Internet by "Annonymous"

    This story originally appeared in "The Blue Press" (a catalog / magazine put out by Dillon Precision Products, Inc., 7442 Butherus Drive, Scottsdale, AZ 85260, phone 602-948-8009.) The editor, Mark Pixler, was kind enough to allow distribution on the Internet.

    This story may be reprinted as long as due credit is given to the author and publisher.

    World-Wide-Web html format by

    Scott Ostrander: scotto@cica.indiana.edu


    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Saturday, 02 March 2013

  • LPBC Press Release about BCSO "Buy-back" Events

    LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF BERNALILLO COUNTY RESPONDS TO COUNTY-SPONSORED
    GUN "BUYBACK" EVENTS OF FEBRUARY 9th AND 23rd, 2013

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (3/2/13)
    Contact: Mike Blessing, County Chair – 505-249-1248
    Alternate: Elizabeth Hanes, LPNM Press Secretary

    [ALBUQUERQUE] – The Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County New Mexico (LPBC) strongly condemns the use of taxpayer money to conduct so-called "buybacks" of firearms in Bernalillo County. Such activities constitute a waste of tax dollars and do nothing to serve public safety.

    "First, this wasn't a buy-back event at all. The word 'buy-back' assumes that you originally owned the guns and are buying them back, when the truth is that the firearms purchased by BCSO weren't owned by Bernalillo County in the first place," said LPBC Chair Mike Blessing. "Second, this event was advertised and reported upon as some sort of 'public service,' in order to 'get the guns off the streets.' This is code-speak from the victim disarmament crowd for getting firearms away from private citizens, whom as 'we all know,' 'can't be trusted' with any weapon more powerful than a plastic straw loaded with spitballs."

    At the event, the Bernalillo County Sheriff’s Office reportedly confiscated 333 firearms, some of them assumed to be stolen property. Criminals turning in stolen weapons were subsequently compensated – no questions asked – using taxpayer dollars, thereby creating great incentive for these lawbreakers to target law-abiding gun owners for burglary.

    "The LPBC decries this waste of taxpayer money, not only the $50,000 paid out to individuals surrendering firearms but also the wages of law enforcement officers conducting the event," Blessing added. "The LPBC will continue to work to abolish this sort of nonsensical activity by our county officials."

    -30-

    ABOUT THE LIBERTARIAN PARTIES OF NEW MEXICO AND BERNALILLO COUNTY

    Established in 1972 by Margaret Mathers in Farmington, LPNM is the third-largest political party in the state. LPNM seeks to preserve personal liberty and freedom by opposing new or more restrictive laws, new or more expensive spending programs, and new or higher taxes. Guided by the Non-Aggression Principle, which opposes the initiation of force to achieve political or social goals, Libertarians promote peace, personal freedom, and unfettered capitalism.

    The Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County was started in December 1997 as a county-level affiliate of the LPNM.

    Official LPNM website: http://lpnm.us

    Official LPBC website: http://lpbcnm.blogpsot.com


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico and Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County, New Mexico. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Friday, 01 March 2013

  • LPNM PR -- City Oversteps Bounds in Attempting Minimum Wage Enforcement

    CITY OVERSTEPS BOUNDS IN ATTEMPTING MINIMUM WAGE ENFORCEMENT

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (3/1/13)
    Contact: Mike Blessing, State Chair
    Alternate: Elizabeth Hanes, Press Secretary

    [ALBUQUERQUE] – The Libertarian Party of New Mexico (LPNM) strongly condemns the decision by Albuquerque Mayor Richard J. Berry and City Attorney David Tourek to pursue legal action against Route 66 Malt Shop regarding wages allegedly not paid to an employee under Albuquerque's minimum wage law.

    "It's not the city's job to enforce wage and hour law," said LPNM State Chair Mike Blessing. "This responsibility falls to the New Mexico Department of Workforce Solutions. In fact, the DWS website provides clear guidelines on how to file a claim. Why isn't the city attorney directing the complaining employee to these proper resources?"

    In various statements made to the media, Tourek has claimed the city flip-flopped on the issue of representing former employee Kevin O'Leary in an action against Route 66 Malt Shop because "no one was coming forward to help him." Tourek had previously stated the city should not intervene in the dispute and that O'Leary's only recourse was to "hire a private attorney."

    "The assertion that O'Leary – or any employee – with a wage and hour claim needs to 'hire a private attorney' in order to resolve the issue is patently false," Blessing said. "First of all, the DWS provides a wage claim procedure specifically available to 'any employee who cannot afford an attorney, and has not been paid his/her earned wages.'[i] Not only does DWS spell out on its website the exact procedure to be followed to make a wage claim, it provides a specific form for Albuquerque employees[ii]. Furthermore, any claimant can represent him– or herself pro se in an action against the employer in Metropolitan Court."

    Tourek claims the city's decision to represent O'Leary is "an exception."

    "We can only ask ourselves why O'Leary should receive assistance from the powerful resources of the City Attorney's office when so many other Albuquerque employees are denied such assistance," Blessing said. "The bottom line is the city has no business intervening in a wage dispute, period, let alone doing so selectively – presumably based on the high-profile nature of the case."

    The LPNM opposes any mandatory minimum wage law as being contrary to the principles of free market economics.

    -30-

    ABOUT THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEW MEXICO

    Established in 1971, LPNM is the third-largest political party in the state. LPNM seeks to preserve personal liberty and freedom by opposing new or more restrictive laws, new or more expensive spending programs, and new or higher taxes. Guided by the Non-Aggression Principle, which opposes the initiation of force to achieve political or social goals, Libertarians promote peace, personal freedom, and unfettered capitalism.

    [i] http://www.dws.state.nm.us/Mobile/Business/Resources/WageClaimProcedures

    [ii] http://www.dws.state.nm.us/Portals/0/DM/Business/Wage_Claim_Albuquerque.pdf


    NOTES

    1. Original article


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico and Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County, New Mexico
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Monday, 25 February 2013

  • LPNM Press Release -- HB402 "Assault Weapon" Ban Tabled

    LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEW MEXICO APPLAUDS
    TABLING OF 'ASSAULT WEAPONS' BAN

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (2/23/13)

    Contact: Mike Blessing, State Chair – 505-249-1248

    [ALBUQUERQUE] – The Libertarian Party of New Mexico (LPNM) applauds the House Consumer and Public Affairs Committee decision to table House Bill 402, which would have made it illegal for most New Mexicans to own an "assault weapon or large-capacity ammunition feeding device."

    "This was a surprisingly sensible decision by committee members, given there's no clear definition of what an 'assault weapon' actually is and because gun bans only serve to disarm the law-abiding public," said LPNM State Chair Mike Blessing. "Furthermore, the ridiculous wording of the proposed law made it virtually unenforceable."

    The ban would have exempted several groups of individuals, including law enforcement officers and military personnel. More problematic, the bill would have exempted "a person [who] possesses an assault weapon or large-capacity ammunition-feeding device for use exclusively at a firing range owned and operated by a gun dealer licensed in New Mexico and the assault weapon or large-capacity ammunition-feeding device is located on the premises of the firing range."

    "You have to ask what the point of banning 'assault weapons' is if a person is still allowed to own one as long as they claim they're only going to use it at a firing range," Blessing added. "It's idiotic to think this clause could possibly be enforced. If a police officer stopped you while you were initially transporting your so-called assault weapon to the firing range, would you be fined or jailed? And who would be tasked with ensuring people who own 'assault weapons' were keeping them at a firing range at all times? It's ridiculous."

    The term "assault weapon" currently enjoys no singular legal definition. It's normally used to refer to the cosmetic features of semi-automatic firearms and can refer to firearms of any caliber. For example, a "military style" semi-automatic .22 caliber rifle may be designated an "assault weapon," whereas a common semi-automatic .22 caliber "hunting style" rifle would not be considered an "assault weapon."

    "The LPNM opposes gun control laws at any level and considers them unconstitutional," Blessing added. "The LPNM will continue to vigorously fight to protect the Second Amendment rights of New Mexico citizens."

    -30-

    ABOUT THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF NEW MEXICO

    Established in 1972 by Margaret Mathers in Farmington, LPNM is the third-largest political party in the state. LPNM seeks to preserve personal liberty and freedom by opposing new or more restrictive laws, new or more expensive spending programs, and new or higher taxes. Guided by the Non-Aggression Principle, which opposes the initiation of force to achieve political or social goals, Libertarians promote peace, personal freedom, and unfettered capitalism.

    Official LPNM website: http://lpnm.us

    Thanks to Maureen Johnson for putting together this press release.


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico, Maureen Johnson and Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Thursday, 21 February 2013

  • Fox News Foul-up

    So much for Fox News being the infallible news source that GOP Coggies portray it as being.

    Here we've got them reporting that "Russian jets circled US territory of Guam" –


    Original article here

    The article says that:

    The Air Force confirms that two Russian bombers on Tuesday circled the U.S. island territory of Guam, prompting U.S. jets to scramble and respond.

    Two U.S. Air Force F-15 fighter aircraft, operating out of Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, intercepted the Russian Tu-95 bomber aircraft, which left in a northbound direction, said military spokeswoman Capt. Kim Bender.

    Except there's one mistake – one that Fox News' proofreaders and editors should have caught:

    The article title says Guam was buzzed by "Russian jets," yet the Tu-95 Bear uses turboprop engines – the spinning props are plainly visible in the picture above.

    Thanks to "Laughing_Wolf" at Blackfive.net for the tip-off!


    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

  • Washington's (and My Own?) Birthd . . . Week

    Got this recently from The Daily Reckoning:

    The Daily Reckoning – Monday, February 18, 2013

    Greg Kadajski checking in today from Baltimore, Maryland . . .

    Dear Reader,

    Today is "Washington’s Birthday." Well . . . not really. George Washington was actually born on February 22nd. But thanks to the Uniform Monday Holiday Act – the purpose of which you can only guess at – we now celebrate it on the third Monday of February.

    And so, in a sense, the US government now mandates that "February 22nd" actually fall somewhere between February 15th and February 21st of each calendar year.

    Yup . . . That seems in keeping with a governmental view of the facts.

    Considering that my own birthday falls into this same time frame (21 February), does this apply to me as well?

    Can I get a guaranteed day off with pay, as the Posties do every year for "President's Day" ?


    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

  • Responding to the BCSO "Buy-Back"

    -------- Original Message --------
    Subject: Responding to the BCSO "Buy-Back"
    Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:19:37
    From: Mike Blessing
    To: Tom Zdunek, Debbie O'Malley, Art De La Cruz, Maggie Hart Stebbins, Lonnie C. Talbert, Wayne A. Johnson, Dan Houston

    Dear Commissioners, Mr. Zdunek:

    Recently I was surfing the web and found the following:

    BernCo Compass: Gun Buybacks, Strip Club Rules and Downtown Housing

    Here's the pertinent part:

    Issue: Gun Buyback

    The county conducted its first gun buyback day on Saturday, Feb. 9, in the North Valley. People who anonymously surrendered their firearms were compensated – no questions asked. If the weapons were stolen, they were to be returned to their rightful owners. Deputy County Manager Tom Swisstack said the program brought in 333 weapons, seven of which were assault rifles. The $50,000 put up by the county for purchasing the guns ran out within two hours.

    Swisstack added that it’s the most successful buyback day in the state so far. He thanked Sheriff Dan Houston for doing an outstanding job, and Commissioner Debbie O’Malley for moving the program forward.

    BernCo View

    O’Malley thanked everyone for the compliments but said when she got to the North Valley Command Center on Saturday, she was surrounded by other gun traders in the parking lot. They waited outside harassing folks, she said, telling them they would buy the guns for more than the county was paying. She said she was surprised people could do that kind of gun trading in a parking lot without permits.

    Swisstack assured that next time, the sheriff would block off the area around the substation. The next buyback day is Saturday, Feb. 23, at the South Area Command Center (2039 Isleta SW).

    First, this wasn't a buy-back event at all – the word "buy-back" assumes that you originally owned them and are buying them back, when the truth is that the firearms purchased by BCSO weren't owned by Bernalillo County in the first place.

    Second, this event was advertised and reported upon as some sort of "public service," in order to "get the guns off the streets." This is code-speak from the victim disarmament crowd for getting firearms away from private citizens, whom as "we all know," "can't be trusted" with any weapon more powerful than a plastic straw loaded with spitballs.

    Third, the ONLY good thing about these "buy-back" events is that BCSO is apparently to return any firearms found to have been stolen back to their rightful owners.

    Fourth, considering Tom Swisstack's anti-Constitutional comments of " . . . next time, the sheriff would block off the area around the substation," perhaps it's time that Bernalillo County picked out a new Deputy County Manager. As well as a new Sheriff if Dan Houston goes along with this.

    It seems that I have until 1 May 2014 to gather sufficient signatures to recall Mr. Houston, and 1 May 2016 to do the same for Ms. O'Malley.

    _______________________________________________________________________
    Mike Blessing / Phone – 505-249-1248
    State Chair, Libertarian Party of New Mexico – http://lpnm.us

    Who owns you? Who runs your life? Who should – you or someone else?
    Freedom is the answer – what's the question?

    "If you wanna live long on your own terms
    You gotta be willing to crash and burn"
    – Motley Crue, "Primal Scream"


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico, Libertarian Party of Bernalillo County, New Mexico and Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Monday, 18 February 2013

  • Countering Statist False Fronts

    Earlier today, I shared a post from the Libertarian Party's Facebook page –


    Click the picture to see the original posting on Facebook.

    One of the Libertarian Party's goals at this year's Students for Liberty conference was to help students tell the difference between real liberty groups and false fronts whose goal is to trick libertarians into voting for statist candidates.

     

    It turned out that was completely unnecessary. They already knew as much as we did on the topic, if not more.

    Some pointed out that when the National Rifle Association endorsed Mitt Romney, the NRA basically told every Republican governor in the country that they could pass "assault" weapons bans, and still count on an NRA endorsement if they ran for president.

    Others pointed out that when the NRA called for more government, instead of ending "gun free school zones" which literally advertise a large group of disarmed victims, the NRA made itself irrelevant to the Liberty movement. Many had become supporters of the Gun Owners of America or another group out of disgust with NRA's support of statism.

    As experts in marketing, the NRA had done the classic trade show trick of having attractive representatives hand out tote bags to every incoming person. The idea is, obviously, that then people put flyers, etc. in the bag, carry around the bag, and that tricks everyone at the conference into believing that the organization has a ton of support.

    Unfortunately for the NRA, Libertarians, libertarians, minarchists, anarcho-capitalists, r3volutionaries, and voluntarists are not that easy to manipulate. In this picture, a student activist has stuffed his NRA tote bag into a Libertarian Party tote bag. Note that the LP didn't hand them out to every incoming person, only to people who requested them at our table.


    Copyright © 2013 Libertarian Party of New Mexico and Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Sunday, 17 February 2013

  • "From My Cold Dead Hands" -- A Coward's Call

    "From My Cold, Dead Hands" – A Cowards Call
    The gun grabbers won't grab, but you'll still hand them over.
    by Jim Object

     

    "Molon Labe!" Roughly translates to 'come take them' or 'come and get them.' These are the supposed words of the Spartan King Leonidas when the Persian Emperor Xerxes demanded he lay down arms and surrender at Thermopylae.

    In the wake of the movie "300," this has become the alternate war cry of the NRA rank and file as well as many other gun enthusiasts. Alternate to, "You can have my guns when you take them from my cold, dead hands," of course.

    Nightmare scenarios are imagined wherein the entire gun-owing population is subject to armed door-to-door gun searches and confiscation by the National Guard, ATF, or some other law enforcement agency. When these fears are expressed online, you'll almost invariably see a link to the video of the National Guard doing just such a thing in the run-up to Hurricane Katrina.

    That is never going to happen. The federal government will never do such a thing. They don't have to. Because gun-owners are largely law abiding cowards.

    Gun owners worship a false god called the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. They claim that this text enumerates, defines, grants, and protects their right to keep and bear arms.

    The Second Amendment doesn't grant anything. No law does. My 'right' to keep and bear arms begins and ends at my willingness to keep and bear arms, period. No document or government grants me this, or any other right.

    Gun owners are the first to tell you government cant be trusted, and must be put in check. They're also the flag-wavingest 'patriots' around. This is a contradiction that cannot be resolved. "I love my country, I fear my government" is no more than a platitude. You love your government. Especially when it makes laws you like that compel other people to live the way you think is best. Your drug laws, sexuality laws, prostitution laws, etc. – those are all precedent setting examples of you giving too much authority to your beloved government.

    It is by the inverse of the same philosophy that they will come for you.

    People in fear of a gun grab are looking at the wrong boogeyman. Feds are not going to park a Bradley at the end of your street and go door to door. They know where your guns are. They know because you told them. When you bought the gun, you registered it. When you got a concealed carry permit, you registered them. When you filled out your range application, bought guns, ammo, or accessories on a credit card, or joined the NRA, you registered your guns. You might not think you registered them, but you did.

    They know who and where you are.

    They're still not going to come for your guns. Not yet, at least. They're going to demand that you re-register, this time in a more detailed and complete way. If you refuse, they are not coming to your house. They are going to fine you. If you fight the fine in court, or don't pay it, they're still not coming to your house. They're going to garnish your wages, garnish your tax returns, put a lien on your house, refuse to renew your drivers licence, and disallow you from renewing any sort of occupational licences you might hold.

    You will register your weapons in the face of this economic pressure.

    Later, they will ban most, but not all of the weapons. They will use these same economic techniques to get you to bring them in. They will allow you to save face by taking your guns in the form of a buyback. They'll pay you for the guns. Hell, the might even pay you handsomely.

    You will comply.

    For those who don't comply, they will start to enact other pressures and start jailing people for failure to pay the increasingly huge fines. Nobody will ever be jailed for refusing to turn over the guns. No. Jail-time will come in the form of convictions for fine defiance, or failure to appear for hearings related to the fines.

    You will comply.

    They will then offer plea bargains for information leading them illegal weapons. People will rat you out. The NRA will turn over all of your addresses, day 1. You'll deny you have the guns, and they will say, "We don't believe you." Many people who already turned in their guns will be subject to the catch-22 of being called a liar with nothing left to turn in. They'll have to find and buy guns from family, friends, or the black market – just to turn them in and stay out of jail.

    Your range buddy, former platoon mate, or your cousin will turn you over in exchange for debt forgiveness on the five-figure levies hanging over their head. You might turn around and do the same to the next guy. I bet you will.

    You will comply.

    When everyone is sitting around with .22s and 20g side-by-sides to the exclusion of all other weapons – they might start coming for the guns. Most people will turn them over in exchange for a plea deal. By this time, your guns will be felonies, and you don't want to go to prison and lose everything, do you? If you force it, they might just bring huge force to bear, you will look at it, see the hopelessness of your situation, and you will comply.

    Your local police force has a Bearcat street-tank and military grade personal equipment. If they show up at your house, you will come out with your hands up.

    You will comply.

    Around this time, there will be another Waco. Then another. Then another. And it will be a Waco, very definitively. They're going to go after some group or person whose lifestyle is abnormal or uncommon. They will kill them. They're going to refer to them as domestic terrorists and extremist radicals. They'll vilify these weirdos, and people will support the disarmament. When the kooks, racists, and religious whackos fight back, the game is over.

    Every subsequent decent holdout will be painted as a terrorist, whacko, racist, or religious extremist. After the first two or three standoffs or shootouts, people wont even pay attention anymore. The news won't cover it anymore.

    My guess is that 99% of gun owners won't make it to the 'come and get them stage,' and most of those who do – will be killed.

    You complied with government all the way to this point. You will continue to do so. You sit defiantly and say, "Not me. I know what you mean, but I won't be one of those cowards." I believe that you believe that. But when it happens, when it's real, we'll see what you're made of.

    I will not comply.


    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

  • What Kind of Psychic Am I?

    The What Kind of Psychic Are You? Test

    Written by SoftPurple

    My result for The What Kind of Psychic Are You? Test . . .

    Shaman

    You scored 5 Empath, 7 Channeler, 7 Medium, and 8 Shaman!

    You are a SHAMAN

    As you are vividly aware of nature and the spirit in animals, plants, and trees, your style of psychism is shamanistic. You derive a highly tuned sense of danger from your instinctive link with wild animals; this is a great asset – your intuition literally saves lives. You can sense impending danger in all situations, whether it's on the sidewalk, in traffic situations, or in the workplace. You may also have natural healing ability – an innate sense of what will harm or help someone who is ill.

    Your Analysis (Vertical line = Average)

    Empath Distribution Channeler Distribution Medium Distribution Shaman Distribution
    You scored 5% on Empath, higher
    than 15% of your peers.
    You scored 7% on Channeler,
    higher than 35% of your peers.
    You scored 7% on Medium, higher
    than 45% of your peers.
    You scored 8% on Shaman, higher
    than 56% of your peers.

    NOTES

    1. Original article

    2. Reposted –

      1. Personal micro-blogs, blogs, etc – Facebook / Google Plus / MeetMe / Twitter / Wordpress

    Copyright © 2013 Mike Blessing. All rights reserved.
    Produced by KCUF Media, a division of Extropy Enterprises.
    This blog entry created with Notepad++.

Saturday, 16 February 2013

Administrivia
Affiliations
Albuquerque On The Cheap
Audio Files
BlogArchives / by Title
Chatboard
Connect
Contact
"Darth Mike"
Education
Elsewhere on the Web
Email Archives – Yahoo! v.1 / Yahoo! v.2
Employment
Guestbook
Links, More Links, and Then Some
Listening
Looking for Me?
Military Record
Photos and Graphics FilesPhoto Albums
Politics
Previous Incarnations of Me
Profile
Projects, Hijinks, Scandals
Published Works
Pulse
Quote of the Day
Random Shots
Reading
Social Life
Video FilesYouTube
Viewing

Sites, Blogs, Etc. Worth Reading

2600 – The Hacker Quarterly
A Human Right (Oleg Volk)
Albuquerque Libertarian Examiner
Analog Science Fiction / Science Fact
Scott BieserThe Time Sink
Black Man with a Gun
Rex Curry
Devil's Kitchen
Eye on Albuquerque
Michael Flynn – Blogspot / LiveJournal
Freedom's Phoenix
William Norman Grigg
Global Guerrillas by John Robb
H+ magazine
Tom KnappRational Review
The Libertarian Enterprise
Libertarian News Network
Liberty magazine
The Liberty Amendment
Liberty for America – the site and webzine
Kent McManigal
Linux Format
Liz Michael
Victor MilánTragic Waste
The New Mexico Breeze
The Open Source Fusor Research Consortium
Penn and Teller's Bullshit!
James Wesley, Rawles
Reason
Republic magazine
The Rio Grande Foundation
Samizdata
L. Neil SmithLNS at Random
Bill St. ClairEnd the War on Freedom
Doug Stanhope's Myspace blog
J. Michael StraczynskiMessage Archive
Sunni and the Conspirators
S.W.A.T.
Twenty Major
Vin Suprynowicz
The War on Guns
Watchdog Network
Wired
Claire Wolfe

Good Groups to Join

Appleseed Project / RWVA
Boston Tea Party – National / New Mexico
Campaign for Liberty
Fully Informed Jury Association
Downsize DC
Gun Owners of America
Institute for Justice
International Society for Individual Liberty
The Island One Society
JPFO [Mirror site]
Keep and Bear Arms.com
Libertarian Futurist Society
Libertarian Party – National / New Mexico
Oath Keepers
Pink Pistols
Rio Grande FoundationNew Mexico Liberty
Tyranny Response Team – National / NM

Sites with Useful Stuff

FreeGIS.org
freewarehome.com
Gunbroker.com
Laissez Faire Books
Mozilla
Libre Office
Paladin Press
pendriveapps.com
pendrivelinux.com
portableapps.com
Project Gutenberg – free (no-charge) eBooks
Puppy Linux
SimpleCare
Ubuntu Linux

free counters