Month: June 2009

  • Celebrate the 4th of July in Santa Fe


    FREE TABLE SPACE!

    For directions to the event, go to Google Maps and enter these coordinates into the search bar — 35.659095,-105.97791 — that will take you right to the spot — see HERE.


    View Larger Map

    Help show America that Independence Day is about more than fireworks, hot dogs and last-minute beer runs.

    This coming July 4th, celebrate Independence Day and spread the word about your group or company with a FREE vendor spot at a rally in Santa Fe sponsored by one of the biggest political exploratory committees in the nation.

    What we’re looking for — organizations offering literature, bumperstickers, flyers, buttons, etc. that support the message put out by the 2008 Ron Paul presidential campaign.

    What we’re offering — two 6-foot tables’ worth of space (supply your own tables) for you to advertise your organization or company at least two hours for the public to see your display. We host the event, you show your stuff — AT NO COST TO YOU!

    What we’re NOT looking for is material related to the following –

    • the “Obama deception”
    • “9/11 truth”
    • racial nationalism / supremacy (KKK, La Raza, etc.)
    • anti-Liberty religion
    • conspiracy theories


    On that note, we reserve the right to review materials for display, and to reject materials and/or vendors.

    Contact Mike Blessing at mikewb1971@gmail.com or 505-515-7015 to get on the list.

    Tables will be allocated on a space-available, first-come first serve basis. If you don’t show up at the event for your spot, the spot goes to the next one on the list.


  • Nukes and the Second Amendment

    Current mood: annoyed

    I’m sure that we’ve all heard it before when discussing the right to own and carry weapons (especially handguns) with hoplophobes and fence-sitters —

    C’mon now, let’s be reasonable here — when they wrote the Second Amendment, they weren’t talking about nuclear weapons. Why would anyone want one of those?

    FIRST, this argument is a way for the prosepctive hoplophobe to hook you, the advocate of an armed citizenry, over to his side. After all, who doesn’t want to be “reasonable,” right?

    NOW for the purposes of discussion, let’s assume that my next-door neighbor actually has a fully-functional 20-kiloton fission device in his garage.

    SECOND, if he doesn’t set it off, who is harmed? If he does decide to detonate, I won’t even know it if I’m home — the fireball will vaporize the nerves before the signal has time to register in the brain, and I’ll never feel it. And who will the survivors prosecute and/or sue? Certainly not him!

    THIRD, I’d like to know who his investment broker is — nukes aren’t something you pick up at the flea market for Ø4.99, or at a gun show, despite Brady Campaign agitprop — they generally run a few million FRNs a pop on the black market, and that’s for the fully-assembled ones. If you can afford to blow that much cash on a one-use item like that, more power to you.

    FOURTH, assuming he decided to go the DIY route to building his membership card in the Don’t Fuck With Me Club, it’s true that you can get the general theory and some of the specifics from the internet. Still, assembling the parts will be rather expensive — plutonium or yellowcake aren’t things that you pick up at Home Depot for pocket change — they’re in short supply, as they have peaceful uses in the power-generation field as well as being useful in making nuclear explosives. The deuterium and tritium used in fusion devices is likewise quite rare. Add to this the fact that there’s quite a bit of electronics and chemical explosives needed to make the thing work right, as well. Not only does the prospective protege to Dr. Khan need to acquire this stuff, but he also has to know how to handle the yellowcake or plutonium safely (from what I understand, it’s rather toxic stuff, chemically speaking, in addition to any radioactivity), as well as making the electronics and chemical explosives all WORK TOGETHER PROPERLY — you’ll need at least a bachelor’s degree in physics to make this happen — a masters is more likely. If the chemical explosives aren’t PRECISELY aligned and centered, they might still go off and vaporize the radioactive core, but you won’t get the fireball, flash, shock wave and distinctive mushroom cloud — and that’s what the Suburbian Mad Bomber wants, right?

    FIFTH, even with just the “physics package” (the part that goes “BOOM!”), you’re looking at something at least the size of a basketball, if not a beach ball. And about the weight of a medium-sized anvil. This isn’t something that you’ll fit in your pocket or on your belt, like a handgun that the hoplophobe is trying to talk you out of carrying and owning.

    FINALLY, who says that there are not PEACEFULuses for nuclear explosives? We’ve had chemical explosives used for over a century for peaceful purposes in these fields —

    • mining
    • road-building
    • tunnel-building
    • demolition to remove old buildings, bridges, etc.

    In fact, there HAVEbeen efforts to use nukes for peaceful purposes —


    NOTES
    1. Micah 4:3 — And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
    2. A FAR BETTER use of the name “Orion” than George Worthless’ attempt to rebuild the Apollo program — “Long live Nixon!” and all that.
    3. This article was, in part, inspired by an article in The Libertarian EnterpriseRadically Decentralized Defense, by L. Neil Smith
    4. Repostings– by me
      1. Round 1 — KCUF Media, New Mexico Liberty, Fringe Elements, Bureaucrash, and [lpnm-discuss]
      2. Round 2 — The Libertarian Enterprise

  • A Continent-Wide Switzerland?

    Reading this week’s edition of The Libertarian Enterprise, I took notice of an resurrected article by long-time friend L. Neil Smith

    What he’s proposing in in his reposted article Radically Decentralized Defense is nothing morethan a continent-wide version of the Swiss Confederation, commonly known as Switzerland.

    I don’t say this to disparage his article, but to support it by showing that YES there IS historical precedent on hand for his idea. In fact, I wholeheartedly endorse it, and further note that a significant number of America’s Founders would have supported it, as well.

    An addition, though — current (OK, government-sponsored) laser research is expanding to levels you’re only hinting at in this article. At present, they’re working on truck-mountable units capable of shooting down artillery shells and mortar rounds in flight [1]. Where I say “working on,” I don’t mean developing the technology, I mean getting ready for field deployment. Add to that the fact that they’ve already deployed laser units (again, mounted on a truck) for use in destroying IEDs from a distance [2].

    NOTES

    1. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactical_high_energy_laser#Demonstrator
    2. defense-update.com/products/t/thor-IED.htm

  • Good for a laugh, at least



    As I noted in the title of this entry, this should be good for a laugh, at least.

    I mean — come on now — people are supposed to vote between me and a 20-year-old webcam queen over who they would rather “. . . ?” with.

    I presume that the “. . . ?” should be read as “have sex with” . . . ?

    The webcam queen in question forgot that there are plenty of people who can’t be bothered with these “battles” in the first place (like me).

    She (?) should also remember that only one or two percent of the population is bisexual, so people are either going to vote for her, or for me. It’s pretty much a binary choice here. I’m not expecting much of a swing vote in this “contest.”

Pages

Recent Posts

June 2009
M T W T F S S
« May   Jul »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Categories