Day: August 25, 2010

  • How to handle Ronald Reagan? [LP Monday Message]

    August 23, 2010

    Dear Friend of Liberty,

    As the 2010 election approaches, a lot of Republican politicians are trying to posture as government-cutters, and they often hold up Ronald Reagan as an example.

    But although Reagan often talked about supporting smaller government, most Libertarians know that in practice he did exactly the opposite. For example:

    • Reagan boosted import tariffs and trade restrictions.
    • Reagan cut marginal income tax rates, but he also raised Social Security taxes.
    • Reagan increased farm subsidies.
    • Reagan sent the federal debt through the roof.
    • Federal spending under Reagan grew from $678 billion to $1.14 trillion.
    • Reagan set the record for the highest average spending as a percent of GDP over his administration. (Obama may beat him.)

    Many people are complaining right now about unemployment under Barack Obama. In the first 18 months of Obama’s presidency, unemployment has increased from 7.7 percent to 9.5 percent.

    Did you know that during the first 18 months of Reagan’s presidency, unemployment increased from 7.5 percent to 9.8 percent? That’s even worse, but I don’t hear a lot of Republicans mentioning it.

    Many Republican politicians, operatives and talk show hosts like to talk positively about Reagan and try to portray him as delivering smaller government. They don’t say that about George W. Bush. I presume that’s to try and convince voters that Bush was bad in some ways, and we should all try to be more like Reagan.

    Some polls show Reagan is reasonably well-respected these days. I think the positive reactions are often based on misconceptions, and that brings up an interesting point: how should Libertarians deal with the Ronald Reagan myth?

    To address that question, we put up a new poll today. Please share your opinion.

    Sincerely,

    Wes Benedict
    Executive Director
    Libertarian National Committee

    P.S. If you have not already done so, please join the Libertarian Party. We are the only political party dedicated to free markets and civil liberties. You can also renew your membership. Or, you can make a contribution separate from membership.


    NOTES
    1. Original article
    2. Reposted —
      1. KCUF Media — Blogspot / Xanga
      2. New Mexico Liberty / Mike Blessing for State Representative / The LPNM Blog

    bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

  • BTP National Committee opposes National ID

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    Branson, Missouri, United States of America (Free-Press-Release.com) August 25, 2010 —

    On August 24, 2010 the Boston Tea Party National Committee passed a resolution opposing a national ID “or any other bill that would establish a National ID card that includes biometric scanning or tracking devices” 5-0 (with 2 not voting).

    Whereas governments that truly want to protect liberty have no need to track the every move of their citizens; and

    Whereas privacy from government is a chief cornerstone of our liberties, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and

    Whereas in the past, many Members of Congress, instead of taking steps to actually end our illegal immigration problem, have chosen instead to use the issue to dramatically expand government intrusion into our lives; and

    Whereas the so-called “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” proposal being touted by Senators Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham includes a de facto National ID card that would be required for all U.S. citizens in order to hold a job legally; and

    Whereas biometric scanning technology would be included in the card which could allow government bureaucrats to track citizens’ every move; therefore,

    Be it resolved, the Boston Tea Party National Committee urges the Congress of the United States of America to vote to defeat any legislation requiring U.S. citizens to obtain a National ID card just to get a job — or any other bill that would establish a National ID card that includes biometric scanning or tracking devices.

    Party Chair Darryl W. Perry writes, a national ID system would include a “National database of personal information that can be accessed by any Law Enforcement Officer and/or Fusion Center anywhere the barcode on the Driver’s License can be scanned. This database of personal information would be controlled by the very people with access, so you will have no say as to what information they keep. This could include not only your driving and/or criminal record, but could potentially include unrelated information such as your medical records, library records and any other host of information that some bureaucrat deems ‘necessary’. Voting history perhaps? How about party affiliation?”

    Plank 4 of the 2006 program of the BTP reads “The Boston Tea Party calls for the immediate repeal of the REAL ID Act and any and all National ID plans.” Perry adds, “it only takes two more steps to become Germany’s Third Reich, ‘Where are your papers? Your papers, please!’”

    The Boston Tea Party was founded in 2006 with a one sentence platform, “The Boston Tea Party supports reducing the size, scope and power of government at all levels and on all issues, and opposes increasing the size, scope and power of government at any level, for any purpose.” In October 2008, the party’s National convention adopted the four point program of the Campaign for Liberty. Their program calls for an end to overseas occupation, a restoration of privacy and other liberties, no increase in the national debt, and a thorough review of the Federal Reserve. During the 2010 convention the Party adopted a new program to End the Wars of Aggression, End the Fed, End the War on Drugs, End the Abuses of Liberty, End the Immigration Fiasco.

    For more information, contact Darryl W. Perry


    NOTES
    1. Original posting
    2. Reposted —
      1. Personal blogs — WordPress / Xanga
      2. KCUF Media — Blogspot / Xanga
      3. New Mexico Liberty / Mike Blessing for State Representative / The BTPNM Blog

    bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

  • Random Shots for 24 August 2010

    Comments
    1. Posted to Elisheva Levin’s Facebook Wall
      It seems to me that the Islamists are simply the Muslim equivalent of Jerry Falwell (the “Moral Majority”), Don Wildmon and Fred Phelps (of “God Hates Fags” fame), and should be responded to in similar fashion.

    2. Posted to Elisheva Levin’s Facebook Wall
      “Not one person that I talk to who opposes the mosque believes that there is some legal way to stop it. There is not. But they are greatly offended . . . .”

      The people who are offended by the proposal seem to be acting from the same sort of mindset of the Islamists in Dearborn, Michigan who harassed that Christian group for passing out Bibles on a public street — “We’re offended, so you shouldn’t do as you want with your own property.”

      Never mind that in either case, the “offenders” weren’t harming anyone else with their conduct. In Michigan, the Christians weren’t forcing anyone to accept any Bibles. In New York, the Imam acquired the use of the property through honest means, speaks out against Islamists like Hamas, Hizbollah, al-Qaeda, the Taliban, Ahmadinejad, etc., has the local Jewish and Catholic groups on board, etc., etc.

      I don’t see a real problem here, except in the minds of those offended.

    3. Posted to Elisheva Levin’s Facebook Wall
      @ Elisheva —

      “Falwell and Phelps are more than annoying, but they don’t encourage teenagers to strap bombs onto their bodies and blow… themselves up to cause the deaths of whomever might be in the vicinity.”

      Not yet. Still, Christianity, Mormonism, etc. have their share of violence ordered by religious authorities — the Crusades, the Inquisition, the Salem witch trials, St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre, the Mountain Meadows Massacre, among others. More recently, we’ve seen the “Army of God” declaring “war” on abortion and homosexuality.

      Just how likely are the Islamists to actually establish that World Caliphate? From what I can tell, unless there’s a sudden economic crash in the Western world and in Asia, their best shot was in the pre-Charlemagne era (750 years ago), and they blew it.

    Listening / Reading / Watching

    1. The Republican divide: K Street vs. Tea Partiers
    2. Glenn Beck is a Statist, not a Libertarian
    3. Star Wars: Legacy #50
    4. The Infinity Gambit by James P. Hogan
    5. Adult Swim — Robot Chicken, Aqua Teen Hunger Force, The Venture Bros. and Squidbillies
    6. Children of Men

    bomb gun firearm steak knife Allah Aryan airline hijack

Pages

Recent Posts

August 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Categories